🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have decided to pull out from an international accord designed to protect females from violence, covering family violence, following prolonged and heated discussions in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in Riga this week to oppose the vote. The ultimate decision now lies with Head of State the nation's president, who must decide whether to endorse or veto the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last year, mandating authorities to establish laws and assistance programs to eliminate all types of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the initial European Union member to initiate the process of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation withdrew in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a major regression for women's rights.

Ideological Debate and Opposition

The treaty was approved by the EU in last year, yet traditionalist groups have contended that its focus on gender equality undermines traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy debate in the Saeima, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a action sponsored by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a defeat for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who stood with protesters outside the legislature earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the main parties advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose leader has urged citizens to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official urged the treaty not to be made political, while the group the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to national principles, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The Thursday's vote has sparked broad outcry both within Latvia and internationally.

22,000 individuals have endorsed a Latvian petition demanding the convention to be maintained. The women's rights organization the rights center has called a protest for next Thursday, charging lawmakers of ignoring the wishes of the Latvian people.

Global Worries and Possible Future Actions

The head of the European organization's legislative body stated that Latvia had made a hasty choice fueled by false information. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He added that since Turkey abandoned the treaty in 2021, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not achieve a two-thirds support, the head of state could potentially return the legislation for additional consideration if he has objections.

President the national leader announced on social media that he would assess the decision according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial factors, instead of belief-based viewpoints".

Last week, another component of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a worrisome situation for gender equality not only in our nation but across the continent," stated a rights activist.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been increasing in several European nations
• The European treaty requires specific safeguards for survivors of domestic abuse
• The nation's decision could affect similar debates in additional member states